Looking at the anvil class 150 ci fittings that show a rating of 300 psi...

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Shipman
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 175 psi

What about the threaded CI or DI fittings.  Aren't they class 125 or 150?

On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo wrote:
> Everyting we use except sprinkers are rated for more than 175psi......
>
> And even the sprinklers are put through more than 300psi as they come off of 
> the manufacturing line....
>
> Do you have a question about a specific porduct?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It should be recognized that the above is my opinion as a member of the NFPA, 
> and has not been processed as a formal interpretation in accordance with the 
> NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects and should therefore not be 
> considered, nor relied upon, as the official position of the the NFPA, nor 
> any of their technical committees.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Cecil Bilbo
> Academy of Fire Sprinkler Technology
> Champaign, IL
> 217.607.0325
> www.sprinkleracademy.com
> [email protected]
>
> OUR STUDENTS SAVE LIVES!!
>
>
>
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: 175 psi
>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 01:04:28 +0000
>>
>> Had an old thought challenged and I think I have learned something. 
>> Situation:
>>
>> High rise building with a fire pump. Churn plus static to provide 100 psi 
>> (discharge side of most demanding hose valve) on combined standpipe creates 
>> just over 200 psi on bottom floor. Instantly I think to use pressure 
>> regulating valve for the lower systems, feed lower systems before pump boost 
>> or run a secondary standpipe. Another estimator tells me that most sprinkler 
>> components are rated for well over 175. I didn't believe it but looking at 
>> several products from several manufacturers seems to prove him right. There 
>> were a few exceptions such as some sprinkler heads and hose valves but for 
>> the pipe, fittings, valves etc there was no problem. If the project was FM 
>> it would be tougher as most of the standard 5.6 heads were 250 UL but 175 FM.
>>
>> NFPA 13 2007 6.1.3 System components shall be rated for the maximum system 
>> working pressure to which they are exposed but shall not be rated at less 
>> than 175 psi for components installed above ground..."
>>
>> Am I missing something here or does over pressurization of the lower floor 
>> only require pressure reducing hose valves and not system prv's as long as 
>> the components are rated for more than the "... maximum system working 
>> pressure to which they are exposed..." which seems to be the case for the 
>> vast majority of components.
>>
>>
>>
>> [Description: LOGO_10]
>> Rod DiBona
>> Vice President
>> Rapid Fire Protection
>> office : (605)348-2342
>> fax : (605)348-0108
>> cell : (605)391-3553
>> www.rapidfireinc.com<http://www.rapidfireinc.com>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120517/8f1261f3/attachment.html>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: image001.jpg
>> Type: image/jpeg
>> Size: 6561 bytes
>> Desc: image001.jpg
>> URL:<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120517/8f1261f3/attachment.jpg>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>                                       
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120516/226da935/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120517/db678390/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to