You mean to say after all the proposals, comments,hearings, adoption comments 
the rules aren't clear ?  Could that be the issue and not the enforcer ?
John Drucker - Mobile Email

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed Jan 30 12:54:05 2013
Subject: Fire Marshal requirement?

Jim:

thanks for the explanation on job duties.

that kinda explains why some AHJ's won't bend to help "interpret" a grey
area, but it does not justify why they wont.  If we all adjust in tiny bits
to accomodate the larger goal of improved design, then things tend to move
smoother, down the line.  When someone rigidly follows a job title,
lock-step, it is explainable, but they don't get a great review from my
point of view.  And then there are the few that make interpretations on the
far side of conservative, regarding the prescriptions, with no credibility,
other than their ability to stall construction.

Its obvious we are all part of a team, but the incentives (in this case,
the FM written job description) is not helping, and obviously is hurting.
 We are not machines.  We are interpreting things as they need
interpreting, from time to time, and that is where we need to think of
ourselves as part of a design team (AHJ, designer / technician, EOR, owner,
and even the users of the building).  Yeah, I know a lot of team members
are greedy, egotistical full-tards, which makes it hard to work
cooperatively with them.  Maybe we should rate all the team members with
 360 degree reviews...   Something should be done to offer better
incentives to work together and  de-incentivise (or televise) the bad
actions so as to make them better actors.

scot deal
Excelsior Fire/Risk Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20130130/e1cf787c/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum


CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY:
This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and 
confidential, nor is it, unless specifically stated, intended to be relied upon 
by any person or persons other than the individual or entity named above and no 
warranties or representations are made or intended to persons or entities not 
named above.  If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us immediately by telephone, return this message to the address 
above and delete all copies.  Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20130130/a9813815/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to