That's a different issue which some argue can apply to a lot of NFPA 25. Some of us have started preaching (some may say harping) that we can't just say will an activity improve the reliability of the system but what's the cost/benefit relationship. The higher the cost goes, the lower the probability of ANYTHING being checked (other than the curb where they stop to write the report).
Roland On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Greg McGahan <g...@livingwaterfp.com> wrote: > Waste of money.... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20130221/4118400a/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
