What is this "Dry System" you speak of?
Steve Leyton -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: QR Reduction for Obstructed Construction Funny. First thought was how is S. Leyton using QR reduction for dry systems in attic?? Second thought ( took a few minutes for this slow brain).... It's a California thing. Don't do many wet systems in attics in the Midwest ;) Rod at Rapid -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 3:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: QR Reduction for Obstructed Construction Does it say that it can't? We take it in attics all the time ... Steve L -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 1:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: QR Reduction for Obstructed Construction I asked once before about ceiling pockets vs. beam pockets and didn't get a nibble so I'll try a slightly different twist on the question. Can the QR reduction be applied to obstructed construction? Can the reduction be taken for twin tee construction? Ron F _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
