The AHJ's can't answer. They've all locked themselves in toilet-only compartments with candles and potpourri oil pots.
Steve Leyton Cauzanorajen, CA -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Bathroom/powder room/toilet room As of the First Draft version, it has been restored. Will it survive the Comment stage and the Technical session, only time will tell. Also worth briefing touching on adopted codes (when not resolved by the state, county etc). What do we do when both the IBC and LSC are in play? When a difference exists don't we have to apply the most conservative requirement of the two? Right or wrong, I take it one step further and look at both codes to see which requires protection. When only one requires protection if it's the IBC then 13 is applied as is and no LSC exceptions, if only the LSC requires the protection, then all its exceptions apply. If both require it, then only 13 applies and no LSC exceptions. What say yea AHJs? Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org On Feb 21, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Steven Scandaliato <[email protected]> wrote: > Roland, check me on this but I am almost positive that we approved a > proposal to revert the current definition back to the 2010 > version...so this bathroom thing is going to get changed again if it gets accepted.. > > Steven Scandaliato, SET CFPS > 520.971.2322 Cell > Skype: steven.scandaliato _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler .org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
