Yes, I did mean CMDA, we don't have the water for CMSA, at least the city won't allow the extension of the main at this point. So the owner was looking at options to reduce the water demand. Thanks Jamie
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Travis Mack <[email protected]> wrote: > 16.3.1.1 is CMDA sprinklers, not CMSA, unless I am mis-reading your > references. CMDA would just have the 30% increase in the system design > area. > > Table 16.3.2.1 (NFPA 13 2013 edition) is the CMSA section. That includes > criteria for a dry pipe system. I am assuming you are able to use the dry > system criteria for your preaction system. > > Travis Mack, SET > MFP Design, LLC > 2508 E Lodgepole Drive > Gilbert, AZ 85298 > 480-505-9271 > fax: 866-430-6107 > email:[email protected] > > http://www.mfpdesign.com > https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 > Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign > > > On 2/18/2015 2:05 PM, Jamie Seidl wrote: > >> Hey everyone, I am looking at a freezer project, 30' storage 33' building >> height, class II, unencapsulated stored palletized on open shelves. Does >> NFPA 13 2013 chapter 16 place any restrictions on the use of a pre-action >> system for this type of configuration? Specifically I am looking at >> 16.3.1.1, CMSA with one level of in rack, per 16.3.1.1, figure e, or f. >> Thanks for your input, >> Jamie Seidl >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. >> org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > -- \ \ (o> -- If life were easy... \ \_/ /) It'd be called your mom... \_/_) _|_ _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
