It is not the AHJ not adopting the NFPA standards, but the Building Code not 
adopting the latest standard. There are some building codes that adopt the 
"current standard" whereas others adopt a standard of a specific year of issue. 
You just have to live with it. In any case, not all changes are more stringent. 
For example, NFPA 13R used to require a 15 minute thermal barrier in washrooms 
to be not sprinklered. But the current standards deleted this requirement 
making it less stringent. There are so many other such less stringent changes. 
Then, old-timers will remember how the three OH groups were re-grouped into 
two, reducing some densities, and increasing some. Whe ther they do it or not, 
the Building Code Committee is responsible for reviewing the standards they 
adopt, prior to issuing a building code. 

Tony 

----- Original Message -----

From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 6:11:21 PM 
Subject: ignoring new standard requirements 

I'm sorry for my grammar and autocorrect as this is coming from my phone. 

How does the forum feel about ignoring the more stringent requirements of the 
most current NFPA standards all because the AHJ hasn't adopted the latest year? 
As the standards have evolved with each new addition, they typically try to 
clarify murky wording of past standards, expand on topics, or add/change 
requirements based on the latest and greatest tests. So should we be purposely 
designing and installing and inferior product that more times than not is less 
safe just because the AHJ hasn't adopted the latest design guidelines. I've 
heard sometimes the AHJ doesn't adopt the new standard simply due to the 
financial impact of republishing their amendments and not merely because they 
don't agree. To me it seems morally/ethically wrong but I may just be on my 
high horse today. 

Thoughts? 



Sent from my iPhone 
_______________________________________________ 
Sprinklerforum mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to