FM data sheet 3-00 clause 2.1.2.2.3.2 may help - it is for number of 
sprinklers/pressure format.
It is based on the actual spacings


Nicky Marshall
Southern Regional Manager
PROTECH DESIGN LIMITED
Specialist Fire Protection Consultants
Phone: +64 (0)3 579 5577  Mobile: +64 (0)21 433 488  Email: 
[email protected]  Skype: nicky-marshall Web:www.protechdesign.co.nz
Address:105A Alabama Rd, Redwoodtown, Blenheim 7201, NZ Postal: PO Box 4022, 
Redwood Village, Blenheim 7242, NZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Travis Mack, SET [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October 2015 5:10 a.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Tyco EC-25 CMSA requirements

When using the EC-25 as a CMSA sprinkler (current spacing 10-5 X 13-5), the 
criteria for our application is 8 sprinklers at 40 psi. When calculating, do 
you calculate 4+4 or do you do 3+3+2?  Tyco's data sheet does not give 
guidance, nor does NFPA 13, Chap 21.

I've been told use 1.2 * Sqrt (area).  But is that the area based on max 
coverage of 14x14 (8*196 = 1568) or do you use area per sprinkler (140*8 = 
1120).

The difference is that at 1568, my length down remote area is 48' which 
requires 4x2.  The 1120 is 40.  This is a weird configuration, so my heads are 
spaced at 13-5 on center.  As such, that puts me at 3 sprinklers per line.

In this particular project, much of the piping is existing, and the difference 
is 17 psi between the 4+4 and 3+3+2.  That difference requires removing 
existing 6" piping and replacing with existing 8" piping.

Does anyone have any guidance on this?  My gut is that it is 4+4. My customer 
is saying it is 3+3+2.

--
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:[email protected]

http://www.mfpdesign.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to