I haven't seen any rely to your question, so I'll take a stab.

First, I'm not sure where the 30" obstruction width originated. 

As I understand it, if your obstruction is more than 30" wide you would need a 
sprinkler under it, unless there was at least 18" of clearance from the 
deflector to the top of the obstruction, as illustrated in Figure A.8.6.5.1.2, 
which only came into play in the 2010 edition of NFPA 13.

Possibly, if the obstruction isn't too deep, you can omit the sprinkler below 
if you can comply with Table 8.6.5.1.2 and Figure 8.6.5.1.2(a).

Larry Keeping

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On 
Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: October-21-15 3:16 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Obstructions Against Walls

Where does the maximum 30" dimension come from in figure 8.6.5.1.2(b) (2007)? 
What if you have the exact same scenario that's shown there but the width is 
say 36"? Per code I need to then apply 8.6.5.1.2 & 8.6.5.1.2(a) up to a width 
of 48" correct? After that heads would have to be installed under the 
obstruction right?

Just for giggles 8.6.5.1.2(2) comes in handy but where do you draw the line 
with regard to how far the deflector is above the obstruction when you apply 
it? Would you use the 36" limit from 8.6.4.1.1.3 or is there no limit if heads 
are on both sides of the obstruction?

Brian Harris, CET
BVS Systems Inc.
Sprinkler Division
bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/>
Phone: 704.896.9989
Fax: 704.896.1935

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to