The strangest thing! I said something and it came out Todd's mouth. No more posting from Applebee's! (Nurse, another eggnog please) On Dec 18, 2015 2:16 PM, "Brad Casterline" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't believe there is a prohibition, but if you take 2 heads off one > outlet, > you had better verify it hydraulically. > > Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT > 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell) > Sent using CloudMagic [ > https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > I was always taught when doing an upfit you only replace 1 for 1, meaning > if > here was 1 existing head on an arm-over you couldn't say add another "new" > head > and now be feeding 2 heads off that same arm-over, otherwise you'd have to > add a > new arm-over to the branchline for the new head. Now that may have come > from a > spec long long ago but I swore it was also in NFPA, however I don't see it > worded that way in the standard. Any help? > > Brian Harris, CET > BVS Systems Inc. > Sprinkler Division > bvssystemsinc.com<http://bvssystemsinc.com/> > Phone: 704.896.9989 > Fax: 704.896.1935 > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > I've seen wording too. I think it is related to above/below, 1/2 nip > permissible (unless seismic), etc, it's involved, but it's there > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
