How each piece of said pipe loaded into the lift cradle from grade?  Do have a 
dedicated Lull rental to load each piece?

Ryan L. Hinson, PE*, SET**  \  Burns & McDonnell
Senior Fire Protection Engineer
O 952-656-3662 \  M 320-250-5404  \  F 952-229-2923
[email protected]  \  burnsmcd.com
8201 Norman Center Drive, Suite 300  \  Bloomington, MN 55437
*Registered in: MN, PA, & TX
**NICET IV - Water-Based Systems Layout

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rod DiBona
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Army Corp of Engineer Safety

Thanks Ron. We have suggested this and although that would work we then have 
been told that since OSHA refers to NIOSH lifting repetitive lifting 
requirements we couldn't lift the pipe from the cradle to install..... not 
kidding you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of rongreenman .
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Army Corp of Engineer Safety

The lift guys do have saddles made to transfer the weight of the pipe to the 
floor of the lift and cradle the pipe. They have data sheets that can give you 
the maximum weight the lift will hold and the saddles/cradles. And I think at 
various heights.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ben Young <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Rod,
>
> Is this the same issue you/we dealt with back in 2013?
> Here's the old forum thread to jog your memory:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sprinklerforum%40lists.firesprinkler.org/m
> sg33728.html
>
> I still have that OSHA interpretation if you need it.
>
> Did they give a reference in EM 385-1 because its over 1000 pages 
> long, and I'm not familiar with it.
> Link:
>
> http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/Enginee
> rManuals/EM_385-1-1_2008Sep_Consolidated_2011Aug.pdf
>
>
>
> Benjamin Young
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rod DiBona <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I have a pretty tough situation that I was wondering if anyone had 
> > dealt with before. We have an Army Corp of Engineer job for a new 
> > hangar. Pipe arrived onsite and they are telling us that we cannot 
> > install the piping from man lifts. They are adamant that they are 
> > "bound by the EM385 and
> the
> > lift manufacturers requirements." In the lower sections we offered 
> > to install the pipe off of ladders and were told no to that as well.
> > We have asked for documentation and they say that "OSHA" says that 
> > our guys can't lift over 50 lbs each because it is increases the 
> > chance of injury.  We have done a bunch of Corp jobs all over the 
> > place and always install the pipe off of man lifts and ladders. I 
> > can't even imagine trying to get the pipe with some sort of duct 
> > lift or winching it piece by piece. We will take all the appropriate 
> > action, including but not limited to tying all requirements to our 
> > contract etc. but was really wondering if anybody
> else
> > had been told anything like this from th  e corp. Thanks for any 
> > help you can offer.  I have reached out to a couple of you offline 
> > and appreciate the help, I wanted to open it up to the masses.
> >
> >
> >
> > Rod at Rapid
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, 
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering, inventor 
and engineer (1876-1958) _______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to