That's a good point. Just the missing information placard alone should trigger a comment
John Irwin - CET Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers Critical System Solutions, LLC Licence Number: FPC16-000053 Cell: 813.618.2781 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [cid:[email protected]] From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: NFPA 25 Isn't that a non-compliance item per 25? Shouldn't you yellow tag based on no data? R/ Matt Matthew J. Willis Project Manager Rapid Fire Protection Inc.<http://rapidfireinc.com/> 1530 Samco Road Rapid City, SD 57702 Office-605.348.2342 Direct Line-605.593.5063 Cell-605.391.2733 Fax:-605.348.0108 [cid:[email protected]] From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Irwin Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:59 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: NFPA 25 Main drain test - We keep running in to situations where we inherit new inspection contracts and when performing a main drain test, we have no previous information to compare it to. Either the previous inspection by others can't be found, and/or no general information placard has been hung on the riser (NOBODY INSTALLS THESE INFORMATION PLACARDS. ARE WE THE IDIOTS FOR DOING IT ON EVERY JOB?) and no system acceptance information is available. With no previous drain test to compare to, do you just write a note in the "additional observations" and green tag until the next main drain test? John Irwin - CET Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers Critical System Solutions, LLC License Number: FPC16-00053 2830 Scherer Drive, Suite 300 St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Office: 727.209.5122 Fax: 727.209.5126 Cell: 813.618.2781 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [cid:[email protected]]
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
