Houston - we have a problem.  What criteria allowed placing ESFR sprinklers 
below the tees?  That allowance is in 8.6 thus applies only to spray sprinklers

Roland


Roland Huggins, PE - Senior VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.    
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>

Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives




> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:33 AM, Mike Hairfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Roland,
> 
> This situation has 24" deep double tees that are 4'-0" o.c. and the heads are 
> spaced 8"-0" o.c. 
> with the lines installed below the bottom of the tees.
> 
> Somebody has a major problem if ever catches on fire.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Roland 
> Huggins <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:17 AM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ESFR's in Buildings with Concrete Double Tee Construction
>  
> The noncombustible construction is not an issue for ant of the ESFR’s.  It’s 
> the solid channel greater than 12 inches deep that stop things.  Well 
> actually it’s the must be installed in every channel requirement while 
> maintaining the min 8 ft separation that kills it. (See section 8.4.6.3.1 & 
> .2)
> 
> Roland
> 
> Roland Huggins, PE - Senior VP Engineering
> American Fire Sprinkler Assn.    
> Dallas, TX
> http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>
> 
> Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 6:47 AM, Mike Hairfield <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Have I missed something!
>> 
>> Have K25.2 ESFR sprinklers been approved to protect buildings that are 
>> constructed with
>> a concrete double tees roof construction?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mike Hairfield
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
>> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to