To counter management stating they’ll control storage one inspector in King Co 
used to keep clippings of bodies of murdered persons found in self-storage 
units. 

Not a tack I would take.

 It does make clear that control of storage does not happen.

Best.

Bruce 

> On Jul 26, 2018, at 14:45, Steve Leyton <st...@protectiondesign.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, we USED to do them as OH2 all the time and then the pendulum swung to 
> EH and there’s been a measure of subjectivity to it since then.  Most of our 
> work is in CA so the few we’ve worked on over the past 3 or 4 years have been 
> very conservatively enforced.  By coincidence, our design manager’s father is 
> the long-time director of construction for one of the largest self-storage 
> developers in the Southwest and their corporate standard was raised to EH 2 
> just to head off the conflicts that were becoming commonplace with sprinkler 
> plan reviews.   The EH2 classification can be found in the 15.2.2.1 decision 
> tree the directs you to 15.2.2.6(a) Column B for Stable, Exposed Expanded 
> Group A.   If the AHJ sees it as Unstable that commodity drops to .30 but if 
> it’s cartoned then the values become EH2 and EH1.    If you’re used to 
> designing for OH2, your first and logical reaction is, Wha-WHAT???
>  
> But we tend to think about how WE would do stuff and as a current short-term 
> client of a self-storage facility I’m picturing mixed household goods, some 
> padded furniture, a couple mattresses and a mix of other stuff that includes 
> NO hazardous materials of FCLs.    However… MANY small businesses now use 
> self-storage instead of leasing larger premises with storage or warehouse 
> facilities on site.  There are furniture stores nationwide that keep all 
> their mattresses in self-storage cells – that’s decidedly NOT mixed household 
> goods.  In our building is another tenant that makes specialized and 
> custom-fitted Pelican cases – impact resistant plastic with dense foam 
> liners.  Also, NOT mixed goods.   So there is a very solid case to be made 
> for providing an adequate level of protection for plastics.
>  
> The challenge is that it’s almost impossible to optimize spacing in 
> self-storage and the average coverage area might end up being 60 s.f. per 
> sprinkler or less and you have a ton of sprinklers operating in the model.   
> What I’ve done successfully in some cases is fall back on the old “double 
> density” approach with .20/1500 and then .4 over the three or four most 
> demanding cells.   It’s always worked and reasonably addresses concerns over 
> adequacy of the density to control/contain a fire that might have much higher 
> release rate, but that is localized to a very limited area.   We don’t see 
> whole floors full of mattresses in these things but we most certainly do see 
> individual units where the fire load very clearly exceeds “moderate” as would 
> normally be classified as OH2.
>  
> My 3½¢,
> Steve
>  
>  
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] 
> On Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 1:19 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Self storage warehouses
>  
> We’ve done several as OH 2 as well.
>  
> But I have always wondered what the realistic adequate level of protection 
> would be. The ones we usually deal with have partial-height partitions with 
> “burglar bars” separating the units, which allows the heat to spread across 
> the deck relatively unimpeded. I’ve wondered if this would activate adjacent 
> sprinklers before the adjacent units start to catch fire. And I’ve wondered 
> if QR or SR sprinklers are better (or if it even makes a difference).
>  
> Is anyone aware of any fire modeling or burn tests done for these types of 
> units?
>  
> -Kyle M
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] 
> On Behalf Of Art Tiroly
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 1:05 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Self storage warehouses
>  
> They will allow car storage with fuel in the tank.
> Metal partitions will easily transmit heat to the adjacent unit.
> No propane tanks.
> Corp allowed to store overflow stock or equipment.
> 40,000 SF in low bay.
> Corridors will have drop ceilings with pendant sprinklers.
>  
>  
> Art Tiroly
> ATCO Fire Protection
> 24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
> 216-621-8899
> 216-570-7030 cell
>  
>  
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] 
> On Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 3:39 PM
> To: Sprinklerforum
> Subject: Re: Self storage warehouses
>  
> Make sure they have restrictions on things like rubber tires, flammable 
> liquids, etc.
> 
> Todd G Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
> 860-553-3553 (fax)
> 860-608-4559 (cell)
>  
> 
> On Jul 26, 2018 at 3:31 PM, <Art Tiroly> wrote:
> 
> Storage units 200 -600 SF per unit covered by metal screen at 10 Ft. AFF with 
> metal sided partitions.
> Household goods, mattresses, foam  cushions on sofas. Class 3-Class A plastic.
> Roof sprinklers at 14FT is a pipe schedule system from 1956.
> This is a change of occupancy.
>  
> The existing pipe schedule system is not adequate for the hazard.
> The sprinkler system should be revised and brought up to NFPA design density.
> Is the appropriate design based on Class A plastic or something less?
> I could not find anything in archives.
>  
> Art Tiroly
> ATCO Fire Protection
> 24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
> 216-621-8899
> 216-570-7030 cell
>  
>  
> 
> Virus-free. www.avast.com
> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list 
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org 
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to