Funny thing is how come the GPM is never reduced 10%? LOL Anthony
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:13 PM, NSFD <[email protected]> wrote: > I've always done it the first way as well. I believe In Brock's fire > protection hydraulics book he also teaches to do it that way.It only makes > sense, to me, that if you're reducing your potential (static) then you > would have to likewise reduce the residual by the same amount as the static. > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> > Virus-free. > www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> > <#m_4743986496349456438_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:07 PM, MFP Design, LLC <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> *In this example… Apply a 10% reduction to the measured flow test >> results.* >> >> >> >> >> >> [image: MFP_logo_F] >> >> Travis Mack, SET >> >> MFP Design, LLC >> >> 3356 E Vallejo Ct >> >> Gilbert, AZ 85298 >> >> 480-505-9271 >> >> fax: 866-430-6107 >> >> email:[email protected] >> >> >> >> http://www.mfpdesign.com >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mfpdesign.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=HJ8OA4xyeHAoxXNz5mu%2FYfycgtd5nsFrrpvzulZiNkQ%3D&reserved=0> >> >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FMFP-Design-LLC%2F92218417692&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=H%2BwdcgK8DLGBcNoqJEvUrzsXngySwkX56Vgf9gM9EGk%3D&reserved=0> >> >> Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0> >> >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> *“**The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of >> low price is forgotten.**”* >> >> >> >> *From:* Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> *On >> Behalf Of *Fpdcdesign >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 8, 2018 2:07 PM >> *To:* Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: Flow Test Reductions >> >> >> >> What is the exact wording of the reduction requirement? >> >> >> Todd G Williams, PE >> >> Fire Protection Design/Consulting >> >> Stonington, CT >> >> 860-535-2080 (ofc) >> >> 860-553-3553 (fax) >> >> 860-608-4559 (cell) >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 8, 2018 at 5:03 PM, <LLC MFP Design <[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Lets assume a flow test of 100 static, 80 residual, 1500 gpm flow. You >> are required to reduce it by 10%. Is the reduced flow test 90 / 70 / 1500 >> or 90/72/1500? >> >> >> >> I’ve always done it the first way because that keeps parallel lines. >> However, I’ve run into more than a few people doing it the 2nd way >> lately. Doing that has differing slopes and the lines would intersect. >> The theoretical reduction could actually have a higher pressure at a given >> flow with #2 since it is a flatter curve. >> >> >> >> [image: MFP_logo_F] >> >> Travis Mack, SET >> >> MFP Design, LLC >> >> 3356 E Vallejo Ct >> >> Gilbert, AZ 85298 >> >> 480-505-9271 >> >> fax: 866-430-6107 >> >> email:[email protected] >> >> >> >> http://www.mfpdesign.com >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mfpdesign.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=HJ8OA4xyeHAoxXNz5mu%2FYfycgtd5nsFrrpvzulZiNkQ%3D&reserved=0> >> >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FMFP-Design-LLC%2F92218417692&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=H%2BwdcgK8DLGBcNoqJEvUrzsXngySwkX56Vgf9gM9EGk%3D&reserved=0> >> >> Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0> >> >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> *“**The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of >> low price is forgotten.”* >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing >> list [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum- >> firesprinkler.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum- >> firesprinkler.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
