Roland - I agree with what you stated, however, I have always seen the entire 
top level protected with sprinklers. I think the standard needs to be clarified 
on the intent.  It’s on the list for the 2022 edition.

John

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 21, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Roland Huggins 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The easy and CONSERVATIVE answer is to say the entire foot print but lets look 
at what we are trying to accomplish and what is NOT said.  Lets start with the 
question are we required to cover the intermediate landings (any of them)?  No. 
 We aren’t protecting the intermediate landing at the bottom.  IT’s protection 
BENEATH it, IF there is open space for possible storage.  So, wouldn’t that 
apply to our consideration regarding the top of the shaft?  So teh standard 
does NOT tell us top protect intermediate landings.  What  is the objective of 
the protection at the top?  It’s to cover the TOP landing in case someone does 
stick a bunch fo stuff there.  Unfortunately, that's not stated in the standard 
so we have to revert to logic (which isn’t always accurate - lol).  Oh yea, it 
is stated in the Handbook which USUALLY is helpful.

Under FAQ

Why are sprinklers required in noncombustible stair shafts at the top of the 
shaft and under
the first landing above the bottom of the shaft?

The storage of materials in stairwells obstructs the egress route and is 
prohibited by NFPA 101.
However, if there is an open space under the first landing or a large landing 
at the top of the stairs
it is often an irresistible location for transient storage. As a result, 
8.15.3.2.1 requires sprinklers at
these locations.

SO if we are concerned with the TOP landing (aka adjacent to the doors) why 
worry about placing a second sprinkler elsewhere?

Since it is poorly worded in the standard, discuss this with the AHJ.

NFPA caveat as a 13 committee member:  just my opinion and not to be considered 
an official interpretation of NFPA or any of its’ technical committees.



Roland Huggins, PE - Senior VP Engineering

American Fire Sprinkler Assn.

Dallas, TX

http://www.firesprinkler.org<http://www.firesprinkler.org/>


Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives




On Sep 21, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Ben Young 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I'm curious to see how the rest of the people on the forum handle protection at 
the top of the stair shaft, as we have an internal debate in our office.

The 2007 edition of the NFPA 13 handbook has an exhibit, 8.29, which is on page 
334, and is involved with 8.15.3.2.1 in the 2007 edition.

If you're not familiar with the picture, I'll see if I can get a scan, but its 
basically a cross section of a stair tower, and has two circled letters on it: 
B under the lowest intermediate landing, and A above the top main floor landing.

Basically this Exhibit and the explanatory handbook text after 8.15.3.2.1 
implies that the head at the top of a non-combustible stair shaft is only to 
protect the top floor landing, and NOT the entire footprint of the stair tower 
itself.

So under this code, the interpretation was that you could protect a 24x10 foot 
large stair tower with only two standard spray heads.

Does anyone else feel this is appropriate? Or how do you feel about the 
code/handbook change and the nuance behind this situation.

I will start with the discussion by saying that I see the appeal of only 
installing the one head over the top floor landing as installing another head 
at the top over the intermediate landings can often be difficult to do off 
ladders, especially if its a very tall stair tower.

I also can also understand that from an AHJ perspective, 'sprinklers installed 
at the top of the shaft' in the code language would be conservatively read as 
the ENTIRE top.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks,
Ben Young
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to