Yeah, once you have to decide between buying 400 pendents or 400 dry pendents, 
it’s a little easier to find yourself on the unconservative (non-conservative? 
Liberal?)... the side that doesn’t want to spend that much money.

I know that isn’t a popular opinion around here sometimes, but that’s how it 
is. Were trying to do the right thing, but I don’t know that there’s a good way 
to justify spending that kind of money just to be on the safe side.

But that’s why I ask the question, to get some diverse feedback.

-Kyle M

On Apr 2, 2019, at 7:58 PM, Travis Mack 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

We see these installations in 40k sq ft areas and more. It is a huge cost 
impact. John has a great point. But I don’t have the PE letters behind my name 
so I tend to be a bit on the conservative side.

Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
480-505-9271
MFP Design, LLC
www.mfpdesign,com
Send large files to MFP Design via:
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.hightail.com_u_MFPDesign&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=V3Eiwc4ZZsRzGPRY80TQaO6x2N0LfjQnxcApcA1dh4I&e=>

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 2, 2019, at 7:27 PM, Fpdcdesign 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

John,

I understand your position, but most of this type of installation I see is 8 
sprinklers or less. I don’t think that dry vs standard sprinklers in this type 
of installation have a significant impact to fire protection. I would prefer to 
err on the side of caution.

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)


On Apr 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM, <John Denhardt<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:


I fully understand you position but the standard has involved in my opinion.  
If the piping is not subject to freezing, normal sprinklers and a wet system 
provide better fire protection for the building and the owner.  (My personal 
opinion)

The current NFPA 13s allow it.  There is additional language in the standard 
where the system can be exposed to temperatures below 32F for short periods.

John

John August Denhardt, P.E.
301.343.1457 - Mobile

From: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 On Behalf Of Fpdcdesign
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:23 PM
To: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: Dry Pendents Required in Coolers?

There is a magic number of 40degF that shows up a lot in 13 for wet vs dry. I 
use the same for determining dry pendent vs wet. Under 40degF COOLER, DRY 
PENDENT.

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)



On Apr 2, 2019 at 7:51 PM, <John Denhardt<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
I have done it many times and never had an issue.  I receive a letter from the 
cooler box stating the lowest temperature the box can reach.  In most cases, 
there are inter-locks to shut down the refrigeration system down if it drops 
below a preset temperature.  Also, cold air does sink.

The cost, reliability (in the past) and future testing makes me not want to 
utilize dry type sprinklers unless absolutely necessary.

Thanks,
John

John August Denhardt, P.E.
301.343.1457 - Mobile

From: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 On Behalf Of Nick Maneen
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:46 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Dry Pendents Required in Coolers?

I wouldn't. Water begins to expand about 37/38 degrees. The key word is to me 
is "reliably". There are all kinds of scenarios where that temperature can 
drop. The standard is set for a generic situation, not a specific one. Also, my 
own home refrigerator has spots colder than the overall ambient temperature. 
There is too much risk for not enough reward.
Nick Maneen
704-791-7789

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 7:38 PM Kyle.Montgomery 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
2019 NFPA 13:

16.4.1.1 Where any portion of a system is subject to freezing AND the 
temperatures cannot be reliably maintained at or above 40 degrees F, the system 
shall be installed as a dry pipe or preaction system.

I’m sure this has been discussed before, but the above statement requires two 
conditions:


1.       System is subject to freezing

2.       The temperatures cannot be reliably maintained at or above 40 degrees F

It says AND, so it has to be both, not one or the other, right?

So if I have a 38 degree F cooler, is it fair to say that it is not “subject to 
freezing”, and thus does not require protection? Is it acceptable to drop a wet 
pendent head into the cooler, rather than use a dry pendent?

-Kyle M
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=bmXRAXyl9zqYO7lvPrJQji8RaiTxbYjRsCLSWnptsBQ&e=>
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=bmXRAXyl9zqYO7lvPrJQji8RaiTxbYjRsCLSWnptsBQ&e=>
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=bmXRAXyl9zqYO7lvPrJQji8RaiTxbYjRsCLSWnptsBQ&e=>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=bmXRAXyl9zqYO7lvPrJQji8RaiTxbYjRsCLSWnptsBQ&e=>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwICAg&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=KryIueb30FAd26l6mZm7ybtajJBrvtYT4CVj0Mtjr-I&s=bmXRAXyl9zqYO7lvPrJQji8RaiTxbYjRsCLSWnptsBQ&e=
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to