Thanks, guys, that is what I was thinking as well.

Best regards,

*Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS*

[image: Burtell Fire_Small]

Phone | Fax | Mobile| Text *406-204-4653 <++1-406-204-4653>*

116 N. 11th Street | Billings, MT 59101

Email: j...@burtellfire.com

Web Site: http://www.burtellfire.com

*“**The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
price is forgotten.**”*

*NOTICE:*  The information contained in this e-mail transmission is
intended only for use of the individual or entity named above.  This e-mail
transmission, and any documents, files, previous e-mail transmissions or
other information attached to it, may contain confidential information that
is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this transmission or
any of the information contained in or attached to this e-mail is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission and destroy the
original e-mail transmission as well as its attachments without reading or
saving it in any manner.  Thank you.


On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:

> Joe,
> The AHJ's interpretation sounds incorrect.  What is supposed to take place
> is as follows:
> 23.4.4.2.5   Where the total design discharge from these operating
> sprinklers is less than
> the minimum required discharge determined by multiplying the required
> design density
> times the required minimum design area, an additional flow shall be added
> at the point of
> connection of the branch line to the cross main furthest from the source
> to increase the overall
> demand, not including hose stream allowance, to the minimum required
> discharge.
>
> In other words, we are now required to add additional flow to calculations
> when we are in a situation like yours.
> The minimum required flow for a 1500 sf design area for OH1 is 210 gpm,
> and the minimum required flow
> For 1950 sf is 292.5 gpm.  If your areas are not flowing these minimus you
> will need to add the additional flow
> as stated above.  It's a pain in the neck but other than one more step in
> the calc that's it.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
> Fire by Knight, LLC
> 208-318-3057
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Joe Burtell
> via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:47 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Cc: Joe Burtell
> Subject: Multiple System Calculation
>
> I have a situation where an engineer is telling me I have to calculate a
> wet and dry system together because neither space meets the 1500 s.f
> minimum. I have a penthouse mechanical room OH 1 (WET) of 1014 s.f. and an
> adjacent room OH1 (DRY) of 469 s.f. I have calculated each room separate of
> each other. There is a full-height wall with a door that separates the
> rooms. The wall and door are not fire rated, so the large room method is
> out. This does not make any sense to me. Any sections that would
> require this to be done. He is saying 11.1.2 of NFPA 13 2016 requires it. I
> argue exception #2 says it does not apply.
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS*
>
> [image: Burtell Fire_Small]
>
> Phone | Fax | Mobile| Text *406-204-4653 <++1-406-204-4653>*
>
> 116 N. 11th Street | Billings, MT 59101
>
> Email: j...@burtellfire.com
>
> Web Site: http://www.burtellfire.com
>
> *“**The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
> price is forgotten.**”*
>
> *NOTICE:*  The information contained in this e-mail transmission is
> intended only for use of the individual or entity named above.  This e-mail
> transmission, and any documents, files, previous e-mail transmissions or
> other information attached to it, may contain confidential information that
> is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it
> to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this transmission or
> any of the information contained in or attached to this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
> immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission and destroy the
> original e-mail transmission as well as its attachments without reading or
> saving it in any manner.  Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to