I have a 13R project with exterior open corridors as seen in 13R (2016)
Figure A.6.6.5(a). Per the IBC were being required to provide protection.

Can I apply 6.6.5.1.1?

6.6.5.1.1 Where sidewall sprinklers are installed beneath
decks or balconies constructed with open wood joists, sprinklers
shall be permitted to be installed with deflectors not less
than 1 in. (25 mm) or more than 6 in. (152 mm) below the
structural members, provided that the deflector is not more
than 14 in. (356 mm) below the underside surface of the deck.

If so, does this restrict me from using EC head, since 13R only says
"sidewall sprinklers" and since it’s a combustible obstructed construction?
Therefore, requiring a smooth flat ceiling.

Thanks for your help in advance,

Dane Long, AET
Engineering Technician | Bamford Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc.
P:    785.825.7710
F:    785.825.0667
A:   1383 W. North Street  Salina, KS  67401



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On
Behalf Of Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 9:14 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Prahl, Craig/GVL <craig.pr...@jacobs.com>; Matt Grise
<m...@afpsprink.com>; Kevin Hall <kh...@firesprinkler.org>
Subject: RE: Thread connection holding on one thread only

The depth of engagement to form a leakproof connection is dependent on the
pipe diameter and system pressure.

For general talking purposes per ASME B1.20.1, for NPT pipes, a 1.25" pipe
is shown as having 11.5 threads per inch with the typical hand tightening
limitation at 4.5 turns for a depth of 0.42 inches (<5 threads).  Past that
to get to full engagement requires the use of a wrench.  Effective length of
thread is shown as 0.707 inches.

So it's amazing that with only two threads for engagement it didn't come
apart under the pressure test and stayed in place for 15 years. I would
wonder if there are any other connections in a similar condition.

Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection |
craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com
1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
CONTACT BY: email or MS TEAMS



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On
Behalf Of Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 9:42 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Matt Grise <m...@afpsprink.com>; Kevin Hall <kh...@firesprinkler.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Thread connection holding on one thread only

If I recall from my book-learning days, there is a pretty well established
minimum thread engagement that provides the full strength of a threaded
connection. (maybe 3?). That may also only apply to bolts though.

Matt


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On
Behalf Of Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2022 8:33 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Kevin Hall <kh...@firesprinkler.org>
Subject: Re: Thread connection holding on one thread only

I do not believe one is sufficient. I recall a project where the
specification limited the maximum number of exposed threads to 2 or 3. I'd
have to do some research to find the product/installation standard that was
referenced.


Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE

Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services

American Fire Sprinkler Association

kh...@firesprinkler.org

214-349-5971


On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:16 AM Dan Arbel via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:

> Dear Forum Members
>
> I have a case where 1.25" NPT pipe nipple was connected to 1.25" BSP 
> (as per British standard) pipe.
>
> Sprinkler System in interstitial space.
>
> There was only 2 threads engagement.
>
> After about 15 years somebody touched the a pipe and the connection 
> disengaged.
>
> I would appreciated the members opinion on the allegation that even 
> one thread engagement is sufficient providing sufficient strength.
>
> Dan Arbel
> Dan Arbel Risk Engineering Ltd
> Mail: d...@riskmanage.com
> WEB SITE:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http
> s*3a*2f*2fwww.riskmanage.com__;JSUl!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo
> 1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-yghiPIMw$
> &c=E,1,rOBCJWaUiWX-Zi-j03j48v-ojODJ4zDjCTCn-XcTQUWSVSZzQRanv2vrdqlUogX
> nkOECEYOqMT2eMuzN6PVEfyuVyVF6Hoz4BiV1VyGvBRCcljgZH2U,&typo=1
> Mobile: +972-52-6611337
> Tel: +972-4-8243337
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http
> *3a*2f*2flists.firesprinkler__;JSUl!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo
> 1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-zXS7SC2A$
> .org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,RvPpy3ldS
> C8kzu280ouAOq2QKBzNGfMu7REiocN-XOdCtouKzXB4EaUtnbHa1UoPns-R2H1fzQj-fW-
> oIX3YW0Doh9ZL84fg3cNaQ0q1OQ,,&typo=1
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http*3a*2f
*2flists.firesprinkler.org*2flistinfo.cgi*2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
&c=E,1,wikZY07kLJSV87o86Ivs1Jsxm4l75jKdQbbfbZ7tVZifvQRGY33Wh20_IAQ7wACFTF9yF
LpxM-xqELTjxDST6UJ7dCl0WTqJP_LkvfP8qA,,&typo=1__;JSUlJSU!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU
8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo1tisvmulk98nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-w4GyP2OA$
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/spri
nklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XkU8cH2TMBKLQ2ZlRo1tisvmulk9
8nUEHNhgQ5Y2N2mjqKrtgbiQDgiMg-w8lV3Y3w$

________________________________

NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing,
copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to