In the meantime, I've started processing this task: http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=981
BTW, when you look at those wiki pages: * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stani%27s_Python_Editor * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PyScripter ...you'll see that they have absolutely no real external references, so I'm beginning to think that our reviewers are a bit harsh with our submission! Could this be an argument to push our submission? -Pierre Le 29 mars 2012 10:35, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> a écrit : > I've updated logo and dispute history. It just needs a few references to > resubmit. > > I've just found another review > - http://fedora.cz/seznameni-s-python-ide-spyder/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spyder" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spyderlib/-/cavL5kSGD2YJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
