On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]> wrote: > In the meantime, I've started processing this task: > http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=981 > > BTW, when you look at those wiki pages: > * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stani%27s_Python_Editor > * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PyScripter > ...you'll see that they have absolutely no real external references, > so I'm beginning to think that our reviewers are a bit harsh with our > submission! > > Could this be an argument to push our submission?
Yes. I think so. Even if it will result in big cleansing of Wikipedia for Python editors, at least everybody in Python community will receive a signal. However, there should be somebody else to raise the argument as I've already raised a similar one in the past, after which editors just stacked some links for the editors in question. -- anatoly t. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
