it should be pretty stable, we havent had much dramatic going on.  i  
moved some things around a bit in r2174 with regards to eager loading  
but i think those changes have ironed out pretty well.

On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Daniel Miller wrote:

>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've been lurking here in the shadows for a while...this particular  
> topic looks very interesting to me and I'd love to upgrade to HEAD  
> to try it out. However, I'm wondering what the risk factor is in  
> doing that? Have there been any other major (potentially  
> destabilizing) changes lately? I'm using r2168 right now, and it's  
> been very stable. I've upgraded to HEAD quite a few times over the  
> past year and I've always been impressed with (1) the overall  
> stability of SA and (2) speed with which bugs were fixed when they  
> are found. I'm just asking for a general idea of how stable you  
> feel the trunk is right now. Don't worry, I'll take responsibility  
> for my actions and will in no way hold you responsible for anything  
> that may occur if I decide to upgrade right now--just looking for a  
> general indicator. Thanks.
>
> ~ Daniel
>
>
> Michael Bayer wrote:
>> server-side cursors (i.e. named) for all postgres functionality by
>> default is currently in the trunk, and you can turn it off by saying
>> "client_side_cursors=True" in create_engine().  however one user
>> reported that table reflection breaks, which I cannot reproduce.  so
>> can some folks please try out the trunk with postgres and see if  
>> we can
>> go with server side cursors by default?  ive run the unit tests many
>> times with both settings and i dont perceieve any performance hit  
>> from
>> using server side cursors.  id like this to be in the next  
>> release, but
>> if theres some issue using server side cursors in all cases, then i
>> have to break open the code and make it a lot more complex to detect
>> the conditions where server-side cursors are appropriate.
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to