Michael Bayer ha scritto:
On Jan 15, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
My idea is simple.
1) When the database does not support schema, the schema name specified
in Table costructor should be prepended to the table name.
foo = Table('foo', ..., schema='bar')
result in a table named bar_foo
why not just name your table "bar_foo" ?
Because I want to use SQL schema, if available.
why have two ways to do the
same thing ?
Convenience?
Moreover it is not the same thing.
On PostgreSQL SQLAlchemy will create the schema bar and the table foo in
it, with MySQL 4.x SQLAlchemy will create the table foo_bar.
how would this work with autoloading ?
Not sure here, but what's the problem?
why make a
keyword argument called "schema" do something that is nothing like a
what a "schema" actually is ?
A schema is simply a namescape.
However this is only an idea, for more 'serious' requests I will use the
tracker.
Thanks and regards Manlio Perillo
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
