i mentioned this dictionary-order on my ramblings some weeks ago; then u didnt take it into account.
i've managed here to get repeatable testing and SQL generation with hack-replacing many {} with ordered ones, but i don't like the solution. Why not just use util.Dict (defaulting to dict) instead of {}? Then whoever wants, replaces that with Ordered one and voila, all things get repeatable, if a little slower. > assuming this is ticket 461 which has been fixed and some extra > testing options added to catch these better. > > if youre wondering about "random" its because there is more than > one way to produce a "topological sort" for many partial > orderings...so when the initial "A is dependent on B, B is > dependent on C" information sent to the sorter is incorrect as it > was here, it will produce errors only if the resulting sort happens > to turn out in an certain way, which is generally based on python's > dictionary ordering for that particular run. things like -OO and > such will change the ordering you get from dicts. > > as far as "blocking", its definitely not time to use SA in any kind > of avionics or medical devices...id wait another 25 years for that. > > On Feb 6, 6:37 am, "sagblmi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I run the testsuite more than once, results are differents. > > This strange behavior disappear when the the testsuite is > > launched with python in optimize mode 'python -OO alltest.py' > > This is particularly true with orm.inheritance5. > > > > Very very strange and very blocking since we can't guarantee the > > result. > > > > Any idee? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---