Jonathan Ellis wrote: > For instance, I remember reading somewhere that AM wasn't very good > at playing well with the rest of SA when AM wasn't enough, so I never > bothered looking at AM very hard. I don't see anything on the elixir > site about this issue, but maybe I am looking in the wrong place.
I know for sure that Elixir plays a bit better with the rest of SA than ActiveMapper ever did, but there might still be problems. The key thing is that there are three of us helping maintain Elixir now, and any issues that people find dealing with mixing Elixir and traditional SQLAlchemy techniques are bugs that should be fixed! With ActiveMapper, the approach that I took had some issues and overcoming them required more time than I had to give. With Elixir, having a team of people committed to helping out makes all the difference in the world. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
