> can I have some feedback from the list who is using the thread-local > capability of DynamicMetaData, and/or are using "global_connect()" ? > (another feature i didnt like but it was me bowing to early pressure > from TG users).
Probably this will be no surprise, since I contributed most of the original ProxyEngine. ;) I use DynamicMetaData exactly as you described the main pylons/TG use case: I define tables at the module level, using a DynamicMetaData instance, and then call meta.connect(uri) at the start of each request. For me, this is the most sensible way to handle things in a WSGI-friendly web app. Minimal overhead, maximal flexibility. meta.connect(uri, threadlocal=True) or meta.connect_threadlocal(uri) would be ok, but I think worse as an API since they put too much responsibility on the caller and cause too much repetition. JP --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
