I don't think you missed anything; that "more sophisticated" approach is exactly what we're discussing. Seeing as how you have all three modules installed and switch between them, you probably have your own ideas about how it should work. Please pick up the discussion on ticket #480 and give us your input.
Rick > > > Rick Morrison wrote: > > Sorry, Stephen, I replied too early; your second email arrived before > the > > first. A whole day before the first. > > > > So until we get a real cleanup, you're looking to try modules in this > order: > > > > ['pyodbc', 'adodbapi', 'pymssql'] > > > > Sounds OK to me -- any objections out there? > > Looks good to me. > > I got slightly confused somewhere through this thread. > When I was putting a test together for the passthrough > patch, I ended up using an Import hook to force a > particular dbapi module to be used programatically > (given that I have all three installed). > > Obviously there are variations on that (manually renaming > one etc) but have I missed anything more sophisticated > using SA itself? Didn't look like it to me from the code. > > TJG > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
