On Apr 13, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
>> really, the work to do here is 5% the patch to the in_() method, and >> 95% making me a really nice unit test suite that will generatively >> test IN for every contingency....including the bind param stuff in >> #476 (but simpler code than whats patched there). otherwise its >> giong to sit in the queue for awhile since i still have a lot of >> other more pressing patches i havent yet had the time to test/apply. > > I'll try to create a test suite for it next week, I have already > identified most of the test cases. Should I attach it to #476 or > create a new ticket? lets just go with #476, thanks for the help ! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
