Rick, I agree, pyodbc is certainly the most reliable connector for me.
This does make me wonder how much longer we should keep support for the three connectors. Perhaps we should say for compatibility we'll keep them for a year, but from 21/4/2008 we'll only support pyodbc. That's assuming we don't find some awful problems with it before then! Regards, Paul Rick Morrison wrote: > Unless there's any objections, I think it's time to make pyodbc the > preferred access method for MSSQL. > > Currently the MSSQL module checks for DBAPI interfaces in this order > if one isn't specified explicitly: > adodbapi > pymssql > pyodbc > > I'd like to change it to the exact opposite: > pyodbc > pymssql > adodbapi > > Thanks once again to Paul Johnston for all his work getting pyodbc > integrated, and getting a lot of MSSQL unit tests to pass. > > Rick > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
