Ron wrote: > > Nevermind. I see what I was doing. In much of my code it worked > fine, just like a dictionary. > > But in another part of my code I do: > > for i in self.attrs: > ...blah > > which works like a list. I remember when I saw the __iter__ > implementation requirement noting that that may be confusing.
That's a side-effect of the way dict collections are managed by the InstrumentedList. The iterator behavior will be over keys as you'd expect in 0.4, both on dict collection classes and in dict-based association proxies. I think the 0.3 association proxy does that only to be consistent with the underlying attribute's iterator, but I don't see any strong reason to keep that behavior in 0.3, especially as association dict support is pretty much brand new. Making the assoc proxy's iterator truly dict-like can go in 0.3.9 if there's call. Cheers, Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
