Ron wrote: > > Ok, I applied that change to the version I'm using (0.3.8). That > fixed it. > > But I think I stumbled on another bug/inconcistancy. > > If I tried to str/repr obj.attr it failed. > [...] > Does that make sense? Or is the problem deeper in the code? It > seems to go along with what you said earlier about how the > iteration was made to work like an instrumentedlist.
Yeah, that's the funky iteration in effect. __iter__ on the proxy was changed to be fully dict-like in the trunk and for 0.3.9. The matching change to the underlying InstrumentedDict iterator won't be in until 0.4. -jek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
