On 8/4/07, Alexandre CONRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <main> > <video>intro.avi</video> [0] > <group> [1] > <video>foo.avi</video> [0] > <video>bar.avi</video> [1] > </group> > <group> [2] > <video>weather_intro.avi</video> [0] >  [1] >  [2] > <video>brought_to_you_by.avi</video> [3] > <media_list> [4] > <video>brand_A.avi</video> [0] > <video>brand_B.avi</video> [1] > <video>brand_C.avi</video> [2] > </media_list> > </group> > <video>outro.avi</video> [3] > </main> > > Any thoughts ?
Have you considered just storing the XML serialized in a text field? Do you need to be able to make queries like "give me all playlists with references to xyz.avi" or "find all nodes of type media_list"? As Michael pointed out, the ElementTree example stores the XML data en-masse, so if you don't need those kind of queries, you might see better performance and a simpler way of life if you just serialize the ElementTree instances to XML in a text field and vice versa. Arnar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
