Jian wrote: > > the remove is described in doc as close + extra cleanup > Shouldn't the doc be updated to add that point, which will make > the the life of newbies like me easier =D > Or better: add the explicitly close in remove.
Yeah, the current remove() implementation in trunk isn't yet in sync with the docs. I'm not sure if it is simply not complete or if the feature is in flux... It will get resolved one way or another before the next beta. But for now, I'm pretty confident that having that explicit close() in there won't hurt you going forward. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
