Marcin wrote: > Seems he already did this ;-) And he also improved my patch, in > the meantime I discovered that while my patch was sufficient to > avoid the failure, internally enum values were not correctly > extracted (noticed this while inspecting in the debugger, not > sure whether it is of any importance, I'm still new to > sqlalchemy). > > Thanks for the fast fix (well, and for the whole work on the > package).
Thanks for the spot! This reflection code is all-new in 0.4, totally redone to allow reflection in a single server round-trip. The more schemas it goes up against in beta the better, although I'm fairly optimistic about the general correctness. I also just spotted and fixed an ancient corner case for enum values while reviewing the r3464 patch for the bugzilla schema, so double thanks. :) Cheers, Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
