On Thursday 13 September 2007 22:54:25 Ryan Fugger wrote: > In 0.4: Is there any reason that I (as far as i can tell) need an > explicit 'and_' to use multiple parameters with Query.filter, as > opposed to filter_by, where I don't need an explicit 'and_'? I > think the latter is cleaner. becase filter_by implies and_( x=v1, y=v2, etc...). while filter( expr) takes any expression, and_() is one tiny (albeit very common) part of the possibilities.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
