> > > The core can (and does) use these buckets too, so I'm not sure about the > > user-y moniker.
Hold it. I thought the whole point of this was to separate core usage from user usage? To create a "safe-zone" for library user's private data. > But if that were it, I'd only be +1 on a spelled out > > version like 'userdata' that can be grokked without consulting the docs. Sure, agreed here. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
