Paul Johnston wrote: > I have just put a proposed patch on ticket #573. It uses "info" as the > name and puts it on SchemaItem. Due to the way constructors are arranged > for SchemaItem subclasses, I've explicitly put this in the constructor > for Table and Column. > > Happy to take further comments on this; at least now we've got a straw > man to pull apart.
Looks great to me, I say go for it. -j --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---