>> I was hoping that I could create a another session using another >> engine >> (non threadlocal), for these special cases. I have not yet run into >> this >> need yet. Just out of interest, have you run into any such use cases ? >> >> Thanks >> >> > > if youre using threadlocal engine, you can still say engine.connect() > and get a Connection that is not part of the threadlocal context (and > start transactions off that connection, bind it to sessions, > whatever). therefore you really dont lose anything when using > threadlocal. You've thought of everything :-)
Thanks. Huy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
