Hi, I am just wondering about the traversal order of ClauseVistor, does it have to be in a set order?
I am eagerloading lots (1000s) of relations, and query compilation take a long time, a profiling revealed that most of the time was spent in traverse. So, I am just wondering if the performance will bump up if we do not have to use intermediate lists (or use one less list) to maintain the traversal order. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
