On Jan 15, 2008, at 4:33 AM, svilen wrote:
> > also, i dont see a reason for it not to work if the (A jon B join C) > is a polymunion - all the same, all columns will be present there, > having None where missing. > > 0.4.3? > unlikely, I dont see how it could work from a generic standpoint. the query generates SQL based on the attributes attached to A. if it had to also loop through all the attributes of B, C, D, E, F, etc. and attempt to have all of those add their clauses to the SQL, theyd all have to assume that the selectable for "A" even supports receiving their joins, etc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
