On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:46 PM, jason kirtland wrote:
> > Michael Bayer wrote: >> >> On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:25 PM, jason kirtland wrote: >> >>> How about keeping it explicit: >>> >>> query(A.id, Node.name) -> ok >> >> this is not OK since you'll get a cartesian product from A and Node. > > that's exactly what i intended. Well, I dont really think Query even needs to support returning cartesian products. I'd hate to organize the API around a nonexistent usecase and force an extra method call for the other 100% of them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
