On Apr 16, 7:24 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> always use "delete" cascade in conjunction with "delete-orphan". It
> doesnt make much sense to have delete-orphan only and not "delete"
> cascade.
Oh wow. That clears up a few things for me. I don't remember ever
seeing this (or at least I don't remember taking this sense of things
away after reading) in the documentation. Maybe I developed a blind
spot back around 3.something and never got past it? I have simply
been avoiding delete-orphan although I looked forward to figuring out
how to use it without errors some day. I think this was the key fact
that I missed, even though as you pointed out it's kind of the only
way that makes sense.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
