On Apr 30, 2008, at 12:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 18:25:25 Michael Bayer wrote: >> On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> should have one more argument iterator_func, and that to be >>> passed whatever the Visitor's .iterate is, instead of using >>> hardcoded >> >> fine. r4607: >> >> def traverse_using(iterator, obj, visitors): >> """visit the given expression structure using the given >> iterator of objects.""" > > yeah, i how i get the ClauseVisitor to use that... > The idea was for the ClauseVisitor's traverse to use ClauseVisitor's > iterate (or _iterate), pointing by default to module's plain > iterate(), so inheriting and replaceing _iterate with e.g. > iterate_depth_first (or whatever fancy) would work, without a need to > reinvent the traverse mechanism at all. > unless u're fading out those classes for a reason or another? no theyre hanging around. Just subclass ClauseVisitor for now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
