Michael Bayer wrote: > thanks for the effort. Please use r4640 and specify > rollback_returned=False to the Pool constructor.
I changed that name in r4643 to 'reset_on_return'. I'm hoping to be able to support database-specific methods for state reset in 0.5, and the new option name is a little more future proof in that regard. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
