Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > yes. but the question was, "limit is ignored when offset is zero", > which is not the issue. LIMIT is ignored when its zero, period (it > evaluates to false). the decision to be made is, should Query > circumvent querying altogether when limit is zero. this will be > easy to fix in 0.5 since slices will no longer be generative, so > we'll just return an empty iterator. ticket 1035 in trac.
Sounds good. Keep up the good work. -- Yannick Gingras --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
