On May 21, 2008, at 7:42 PM, arashf wrote:
> > I'm running this query: q = Event.query.filter(and_(Event.id < > id_under, Event.feed == True, > Event.ns_id.in_(ns_list))).limit(num).order_by([Event.updated.desc(), > Event.id.desc()]) > > For some reason, sqlalchemy decides to pull the entire table, yet, > when I don't include Event.id < id_under, it performs the correct > query. > > Here's the query that it seems to be running: SELECT event.id AS > event_id, event.ns_id AS event_ns_id, event.user_id AS event_user_id, > event.updated AS event_updated, event.type AS event_type, event.arg1 > AS event_arg1, event.arg2 AS event_arg2, event.arg3 AS event_arg3, > event.feed AS event_feed > > The summary is, supplying the id constraint seems to get rid of my > where clause. Any ideas as to what's going on here? Thanks. what happens if you say: and_(Event.id<id_under, Event.feed==True).__str__() ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
