Ah, apologies Michael - I should have mentioned that I am using the svn 0.5 checkout. In 0.4 it does raise NotImplementedError. In 0.5 it causes a recursion error.
I understand that the working copy will be more susceptible to bugs etc so please take this as a note rather than a major issue. In the meantime I am just checking against the id field instead. On May 28, 3:33 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in_() is not normally implemented for relation()s. I think the > recursion overflow on in_() was a bug at some point which has since > been fixed (and it raises NotImplementedError instead), but I'm not > able to isolate at the moment if it was fixed for the 0.4 series or not. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
