On 2 Jun., 17:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if i get it right, u make some "map" in memory of that terra incognita
> of those untouchable readonly objects, and then use it ?
> so why not just build all that _once_ into some structure of non-DB
> objs, and then throw away the DB-related? or maybe even incrementaly?
>
The readonly objects are heavily referred by mutable ones (which are
written in 1..n transactions per web request). So, things get simple
when the mutable ones can directly reference the readonly ones (as
mapped attributes.) Using a structure of non-DB (e.g. not even
detached) objects would be possible but more elaborate (Well, I'm
trying to find out whether the approach above bears even more
complexity...)
Now I need to follow my concentration that already has gone
sleeping :-) Good night ...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
