On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Paul-Michael Agapow wrote:
> > But, I have a situation where I don't want FooCollection to actually > contain the actual Foos, just a list of their keys. That is, Foos and > FooCollections have to be handled separately. Obviously it will > involve more paperwork, but how can I make the "members" attribute > just contain the keys? Is a mapper extension required, or is there a > simpler way? we have a class-level extension called "associationproxy" thats used for this: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/plugins.html#plugins_associationproxy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
