On Jul 20, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Rob Cowie wrote:
> > On reflection, I didn't pose the problem very clearly. > > What I mean with regard to appending or removing index objects is that > the collection returned by company.indices(date) would - on append of > an index object - record the association by creating an > IndexAssociation object (mapped to the association table) and save it. > The result would be that appending an index to the collection would > add an entry to the association table with coid, the indexid, the > appropriate date (passed to .indices()) AND a type of 'JOIN'. > > This is similar to the functionality provided by the standard sa > collections. > > Regardless, I think the rest of your answer implies a custom solution > is appropriate. you might be able to implement this entirely using the associationproxy extension. It would need a little bit of creativity regarding the instantiation of the collection since its not directly bound to a relation(). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
